Not when people insist on being so stupid, no. My first post was this: Wow, look at me laying into Nintendo there.
I am dealing with it. I'm challenging them to back up their argument, and they're failing. And it's highly relevant because it's entirely about the original question. Now? The DS is still better. The future? The iPod is catching up because the DS release schedules are getting weaker while the iPod is getting stronger.
Says you. I think there have been several arguments that have proved the point. You have all petty rebuttals with release dates etc. Depending on where you are, a game is out at different times. That doesn't make it less of a game. And sure its region free but not everyone orders from websites from other countries to keep up with the newest games. The newest games are when they are released in your country. Game releases for systems are as a whole, not year to year. DSi Ware games are DS releases. Sorry if you don't have access. Oh but wait, I have a serious english comprehension problem. I can make an argument too about who is acting like the stupid one here but I will refrain.
No, but it makes it less of a 2009 game if it came out in 2008. FFS. No they're not. DS games run on the DSi, but DSi games don't run on the DS. So beyond any sane argument, they are not DS games. It's really quite easy to spot a DS game. It's a game that runs on the DS. I've kept that down to words of one syllable, but stop me if I'm still going too fast for you.
Ok whatever, you win and have successfully killed what was a quite interesting thread. You border on flaming, you make personal attacks and now use inappropriate acronyms in your responses. What is the point in debating you anymore?
